Introduction The impulse of punishment has been a global concern with the issue of mass incarceration becoming a matter of concern in today justice systems. In the United States Cheap Football Jerseys , mass incarceration is growing, and it has spawned the commentary and increasing body of scientific knowledge regarding its causes as well as the consequences for the inmates, their families, and the communities. The imprisonment rates of the United rates by the year 2003 were five times higher compared to the norm that is common in most of the twentieth century, and results indicate that they are three times higher compared to the other Western democracies (Mauer, 2003). Early on Cheap Authentic NFL Jerseys , several writers claimed that the US incarceration was too low and needed to grow. However, in the recent years, as the prison population is increasing at alarming rates, the literature regarding the same has shifted to emphasize the concerns about burgeoning the prison population. Discussion The scholarly debate regarding the prison's population considers three issues. First, there is a contention concerning the extent to which the current drop in crime rates is a result if a large number of incarceration. There is evidence that is briefly discussed in this paper that incarceration rates are not strongly linked to the public safety. The second main topic on incarceration is that there is a growing body of literature regarding unintended consequences of incarceration. In particular, studies have shown that the increasing incarceration rates are coming as indefensible costs in light of the social and racial inequality and have negatively affected children Cheap Nike NFL Jerseys , families, and societies (Nieuwbeerta, Nagin, & Blokland, 2009). The works of this literature argue that it is vital to reduce the US prison populations by using alternative means to punishing criminals. Third, there is a few literature that proposes the strategies for reducing incarceration. It is not something we should argue that something must be done (Clear & Frost Cheap NFL Jerseys , 2015). Needless to say, this point has been emphasized enough and convincingly by a concrete body of literature. This research is important because the work of policy makers in incarceration is hindered by two crucial misunderstandings. To start with, too many policy makers ignore the simple fact that there is a link between the rates of incarceration and the rates of crime. These policy makers also fail to apply the 鈥渋ron law of incarceration鈥?鈥?that the number of inmates is purely due to the number of inmates and how long they stay (Clear & Austin, 2009). For these reasons, the policy makers have been spending unnecessarily much time considering the policy proposals that have little impact on the incarceration rates. Connection between Incarceration Rates and Crime Rates David Garland once remarked that it would be foolish to argue that a connection does not exist between crime and incarceration rates (Garland, 1993). After all Cheap Jerseys From China , it is a crime that brings people behind bars, and surely incarceration has some suppression impact on crime. Thus, as the crime rates rise, so does the imprisonment rates. Even though empirical studies confirm that pattern, the size of effect in both directions is relatively small. Do Monte-Silva (2015) say that, regarding the big picture Cheap Jerseys China , the current crimes rates are what it was in the 1970s, but the prison population rate then was one-sixth of todays. Furthermore, the state incarceration rates, as well as the crime rates, have a positive relationship even though it is not a strong one. Several factors have been highlighted as for why the increasing rates of incarceration have so little connection to crime reduction including one vital limit on the ability of the penal system to affect crime. In other words, when one person is released Cheap Jerseys , another one comes to replace himher thus maintaining the crime rates (Clear & Austin, 2009). That is true especially of the drug-related crimes. However, it is also true for the majority of crimes committed by the youths in groups because the intermittently criminally active groups swiftly find new members when the old ones are imprisoned. Therefore, the likelihood that a crime conviction will result in incarceration has led to the increased number of people being incarcerated, but that has not led to a decline in criminal activity of the ones who remain behind (Mauer, 2003). What can happen if the prison-release rate is increased? The first thing is that the size incarceration will drop. However Wholesale NFL Football Jerseys , what will happen to the rates of crime? The increase in the rate of the release means that there will be more people rejoining the society from prison, and that is certainly a risk factor for increased crime rates. A recent study by Nagin and his colleagues (Nagin et al., 2009), show that the length of incarceration does not correlate to a change in the risk of crime. Thus, sending people to prison for the relatively short duration would not increase their likelihood of committing crimes when they are released. The conclusion that can be drawn from the analysis is that the increase in rates of incarceration as well as the amount of crime has a connection, but not a strong one. We can also say that the rate at which inmates are released is not related to their potential of staying crime-free. That suggests that the inmates can serve shorter prison sentences without necessitating an increase in the rate recidivism. Additionally Wholesale Football Jerseys , maintaining a high rate of incarceration does not necessarily reduce the number of crimes.